Tag Archives: note holder

IS THERE EVEN A “NOTE HOLDER” TO PAY?

Posted on December 3, 2013 by eggsistense

Reaction to a post at Living Lies today in which Neil Garfield said: “If the owner can’t be known, are we really saying that the borrower still owes the money on the fictitious debt that was described in ether note … Continue reading →

Posted in Debt, Fannie Mae, Foreclosure, Foreclosure fraud, MERS | Tagged Bank of America, Carpenter v. Longan, endorsement, Fannie Mae, Kemp v. Countrywide, Kirby v. Bank of America, Living Lies, MERS, Michele Sjolander, negotiation, Neil Garfield, note holder, possession, promissory note, Recontrust, transfer | 2 Comments

IFR COVER-UP: THE PRINCIPAL/AGENT SCAM REVEALED, PART ONE

Posted on April 23, 2013 by eggsistense

So if any of us can stand yet more commentary on the So-Called Independent Foreclosure Review (SCIFR), I have a question–why were only the “servicers” punished? Why weren’t the holders and/or owners of the notes punished? After all, the servicers … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreclosure | Tagged Barclays, Fannie Mae, Federal Reserve, foreclosure, foreclosure fraud, Freddie Mac, In re Hwang, In re Vargas, Independent Foreclosure Review, Judge Bufford, LIBOR, Living Lies, Matt Weidner, Max Gardner, MBS, Neil Garfield, note holder, OCC, promissory note, QE, QE unlimited, servicer | Leave a comment

Tag Archives: note holder

IS THERE EVEN A “NOTE HOLDER” TO PAY?

IFR COVER-UP: THE PRINCIPAL/AGENT SCAM REVEALED, PART ONE

Follow me on Twitter

Recent Posts

Tags

Archives

Archives