Monthly Archives: February 2014
NO MORE DIRTY DEEDS: MANTOR FOR SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER
Neil Garfield writes today about George Mantor’s intention to run for San Diego County recorder: “Mantor is aiming straight for his issue by running for the Recorder’s Position. I think his aim is right and he seems to get the … Continue reading
POLICE: YOU “JUST LOST” YOUR FREE SPEECH
The cop tells this man (the cameraman) he “just lost” his First Amendment, even though the man was not being detained and hadn’t violated any laws: The First Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that: “The filming of government officials … Continue reading
BANK RUN IN THAILAND–CAN’T HAPPEN HERE, BECAUSE…AMERICA?
From Zero Hedge: “Thailand’s Government Savings Bank (GSB) president admitted that clients withdrew 30bn Baht (around $1bn) in a single-day last week and Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives (BAAC) and Krungthai Bank (KTB), although of a much smaller magnitude, … Continue reading
YOUR MONEY IS WORTHLESS BY DESIGN
As usual, Max Keiser’s show is always worth watching. This time, it’s for something his guest–Simon Rose of Save Our Savers said almost offhandedly toward the end of the show (23:57 mark): “It’s like being in The Matrix. You know, … Continue reading
MERS ASSIGNMENTS “HAVE NO EFFECT”; MERS ADMITS TO NO CONTROL OVER NOTES
Jeff Barnes of Foreclosure Defense Nationwide breaks down the significance of the decision by the Supreme Court of Rhode Island in the case of Chhun v. MERS: “The homeowners had sued for declaratory relief, quiet title, and punitive damages, alleging … Continue reading
Rocket Docket? Is it Time to Sue the System?
Now this is what I’m talking about. It’s time to stop wringing our hands, feeling pitiful, and wondering what we’re gonna do about all this. A capital idea, I say! Livinglies's Weblog Is it time to sue the system? … Continue reading
KAREN POOLEY SHOWS HOW TO EAT THE ELEPHANT OF FORECLOSURE FRAUD…
…one bite at a time. Karen Pooley, long-time crusader against foreclosure fraud, recently won her motion over whether or not her adversary can claim work product privilege over some important documents. She sought what is known as “in camera” review, … Continue reading