MERS, PAPER TERRORISM, BARBARA BRATTON

Having read the brilliant decision of Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos in the Nueces County v. MERS et al. decision, I can’t help but think of Barbara Bratton and her so-called “paper terrorism.”  In the Nueces decision, Nueces County alleged that MERS and Bank of America filed fraudulent liens in the property records of Nueces County.  The judge’s summary of the county’s claims:

” Plaintiff asserts that Defendants filed or caused to be filed security instruments in the County property records which falsely represent that MERS has an interest in certain real property as a grantee, grantor, beneficiary, lender, the holder of notes and liens, and/or the legal and equitable owner and holder of promissory notes and deeds of trust. (FAC ¶ 42.)

Plaintiff alleges that these instruments falsely represented MERS’s role or status, and that these false statements resulted in MERS being incorrectly indexed as a grantee and/or grantor in the County’s real property records. ( Id .)  Plaintiff alleges that Defendants knew the instruments were false at the time of filing and that Defendants filed the instruments with the intent they be given the same legal effect as instruments evidencing a valid lien or claim against real property. ( Id .)

Plaintiff alleges that these instruments were filed with the intent to financially injure Plaintiff, as Defendants intended that these false filings would make subsequent filings of releases, transfers, and assignments unnecessary and deprive the County of the filing fees associated with these recordings. ( Id .)  Plaintiff additionally alleges that the County’s property records have been damaged by Defendants’ actions and that this has created confusion amongst those who rely on these records. (FAC ¶¶ 3, 30, 31, 42, 50.)”

Of course they did!  And the judge finds that there is sufficient evidence that MERS/BoA DID file fraudulent liens (because the deeds of trust all say that MERS is a “beneficiary” which it of course never was, is, or will be), and so the case will go forward into discovery!  Here is the judge saying just that:

“The Court concludes that, viewing the FAC’s allegations in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, one could plausibly infer that the recorded deeds of trust [naming MERS as “beneficiary”] constituted fraudulent liens or claims against real property or an interest in real property. ” (p. 14)

Nueces must be the anti-San Bernardino

The summary of Nueces County’s allegations above are reminiscent of the charges San Bernardino County brought against Barbara Bratton, are they not?  In other words, the Nueces County allegations make one think of  “paper terrorism,” with which Barbara Bratton was wrongly associated.   Indeed, if Barbara Bratton is a paper terrorist for filing just two documents that are alleged to be false/forged/fraudulent (even though they really aren’t), it’s obvious what that means for MERS, because their stink is all over millions of mortgages and deeds of trust in Texas (where the Nueces case is being decided) alone!

The obvious question is: why is it that in one part of the country (namely, California), a county goes after a homeowner for once doing what MERS does every day, while in another part of the country (namely, Texas), a county goes after the real paper terrorist, i.e., MERS?  This needs to be rectified–by a Supreme Court decision, a statute, something.

About eggsistense

Writer, musician, cartoonist, human being
This entry was posted in Foreclosure, MERS and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to MERS, PAPER TERRORISM, BARBARA BRATTON

  1. virginia henry says:

    I a years accm in the same situation..here in Rochester ny. see internet,fannie mae and Virginia henry case illegal evicted 7-21-2011 with police forced out with signatures filed ,notarized and forced..still wii not negotiation for over 3 and half years..storages ,damaged,housed by his personal friends robbed my safe and antiques we had over 50 accum.see videos on internet austine streetnd address is 5-11 Appleton street and 46 aug

  2. virginia henry says:

    virgini now a henry regarding 5-11 Appleton street roch ny .property destroyed again after total rehad now f deedannie mae regain title and se since e internet fannie mae and virginia henry we want our destroyed and abanded again

  3. virginia henry says:

    we are still waiting and trying to get this distress ,abandon 3 yrs. now and totally destroyed. property back again to rehab the 2 nd

  4. virginia henry says:

    resell Appleton st roch ny again

  5. virginia henry says:

    realtors larry m . stop you are going jail hunts era

  6. vee henry says:

    I see 5-11 Appleton street roch.ny. sold AGAIN..for 35000.dollars.. we offered up to 60,000 dollars to get it back SINCE THIS STARTED ..LARRY M at HUD.. TOTALLY REFUSED TO DEAL WITH ME OR FAMILY ..this is violation of my civil right.and predjuice.and fraud ,making his partner Jeffrey Harris make an citizen arrest..at the time of arrest..with n o interest at ALL..we had been living there and total rehab since 2007….at ANY WE WANTED OUR HOME BACK.its not over let we will go to appell., court soon.v henry and family and community heip and our church

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s