Category Archives: Endorsement
Wells Fargo Beatdown over endorsements that are not “genuine”
Here at LRM, I have written a lot about the importance of endorsements on promissory notes, specifically what has come to be known as a “ta-da” endorsement, which is roughly defined thusly: “…endorsements that magically turn up on promissory notes … Continue reading
JPMORGAN CHASE DEPOSITION: VOIDING ENDORSEMENTS, CREATING ALLONGES AND ENDORSEMENTS, THE “SWIRL”
Let’s jump in the wayback machine regarding some of the big banks and their robosigning/alteration/forgery/paper terrorism/document-manufacturing for a second before we get into the deposition testimony from a “senior operation specialist” with JPMorgan Chase promised in the headline. Remember Linda … Continue reading
Posted in Bank of America, Chase, Endorsement, Foreclosure, Foreclosure fraud, Paper terrorism, Wells Fargo
Tagged allonge, black ink, Chase, deposition, endorsement, foreclosure, foreclosure fraud, Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase, LNA, lost note affidavits, OPUS, pen, Vermyrtis Jones, voids and extras
12 Comments
FANNIE “MBS”= MORE BULLS@!#: MORGENSON MISTAKEN?
In an article from last week about Fannie Mae pursuing deficiency judgments in Florida, Gretchen Morgenson essentially defends Fannie Mae, saying this (“Borrowers, Beware: The Robo-Signers Aren’t Finished Yet,” New York Times, Nov. 15 2014): “Fannie Mae is certainly justified … Continue reading
Posted in Crap-italism, Endorsement, Everything Is Rigged, Fannie Mae, Foreclosure, Foreclosure fraud, MERS, Paper terrorism, Secondary debt market, Securitization Fail, Uncategorized
Tagged bailout, conservatorship, Fannie Mae, FHFA, Gretchen Morgenson, James Lockhart, MBS, New York Times
1 Comment
IT’S ALL ABOUT THE ENDORSEMENTS, Y’ALL
As we have written about many times here at LRM, endorsements on promissory notes are a big deal, to put it lightly (see list of articles at the end of this post). The judges know this. The banks know this. … Continue reading
BANK OF AMERICA’S MAGIC WAND
The fatal flaw behind the justification of “ta-da” endorsements–effectively no one has “personal knowledge” of them IMPORTANT NOTE/DISCLAIMER: The following article is not legal advice and was not written by an attorney. It is merely a collection of common-sense, rational … Continue reading
Posted in Bank of America, Conspiracy, Endorsement, Everything Is Rigged, Foreclosure, Foreclosure fraud, Paper terrorism, Securitization Fail
Tagged Abigail Field, Bank of America, Bank of New York, Countrywide, deposition, endorsements, Fortune, Frank Norwitch, HSBC v. Rose, Kemp v. Countrywide, Kirby v. Bank of America, Linda DeMartini, Michele Sjolander, OCC, ta-da endorsement, wand
4 Comments
LIBERTY ROAD MEDIA 