Category Archives: Foreclosure

BRATTON’S GAMBIT: DON’T THROW ME IN THAT BRIAR PATCH!

Posted on June 25, 2013 by eggsistense

Thinking about Barbara Bratton’s situation some more, and this occurred to me: she may have finally found a way to make U.S. Bank put up or shut up. Don’t throw me in that briar patch! Bratton may well be pulling … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreclosure, Police State | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

UPDATE: ROBO-SIGNING=”PAPER TERRORISM”

Posted on June 25, 2013 by eggsistense

Remembered more examples of the “paper terrorism” of the banks that belonged in the original “Robo-signing=’Paper Terrorism’” article, thanks to a friend’s Facebook post: Here’s one from the New York Times on February 15, 2012: “An audit by San Francisco county officials of … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreclosure, Police State | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

ROBO-SIGNING=”PAPER TERRORISM”

Posted on June 25, 2013 by eggsistense

So Barbara Bratton is currently in solitary confinement in the Glen Helen detention center in Devore, CA. Apparently she’s being held for filing two documents on April 11, 2013, with two separate criminal counts being leveled against her for each of … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreclosure, Police State | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

BARBARA BRATTON IS NOT A TERRORIST

Posted on June 25, 2013 by eggsistense

FYI: Barbara Bratton, 55, of Ontario, California, has been held in solitary confinement in the Glen Helen detention center since June 14, 2013.  Her bail hearing scheduled for June 24, 2013 has been rescheduled for Wednesday, June 26, 2013 at … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreclosure, Police State | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

BANK OF AMERICA SCANDAL: “WE WERE TOLD TO LIE” TO BORROWERS

Posted on June 13, 2013 by eggsistense

More conspiracy fact: From the declaration under penalty of perjury of former BoA “senior collector” Simone Gordon we learn that it was the policy of Bank of America not just to tell borrowers that BoA hadn’t received borrowers’ modification documents when they had … Continue reading →

Posted in Conspiracy, Foreclosure | 1 Comment

MERS IS THE PROBLEM, PART 5 MILLION AND COUNTING…

Posted on June 7, 2013 by eggsistense

I’ll try to keep this short.  MERS is the problem, not the solution.  I feel like this needs to be pointed out after reading the opinion of District Judge Sam Sparks in the Texas case of Kramer v. FNMA (i.e., … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreclosure, MERS | 1 Comment

5th Circuit Court Makes Mockery of Precedent

Posted on May 31, 2013 by eggsistense

IMPORTANT NOTE/DISCLAIMER:  The following article is not and should not be construed as legal advice and was not written by an attorney.  It is merely a collection of common-sense, rational observations written by a sane, rational layperson with common sense.  … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreclosure, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT VS. TRANSFERABLE RECORD

Posted on April 25, 2013 by eggsistense

Good breakdown from Joe Esquivel from MCI of MERS and negotiable instruments vs. “transferable records”, as well as real property vs. personal property.  Also he repeatedly and correctly points out that MERS doesn’t hold, record, or anything else–MERS only tracks. … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreclosure | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

IFR COVER-UP, PART TWO: ILLEGITIMATE FORECLOSURES

Posted on April 25, 2013 by eggsistense

Yesterday’s post questioned why mortgage servicers–and not mortgage investors–were punished by the IFR.  The reason for that question is this: servicers are supposed to be mere debt collectors.  That is, servicers are not the entities to whom a debt is … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreclosure | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

IFR COVER-UP: THE PRINCIPAL/AGENT SCAM REVEALED, PART ONE

Posted on April 23, 2013 by eggsistense

So if any of us can stand yet more commentary on the So-Called Independent Foreclosure Review (SCIFR), I have a question–why were only the “servicers” punished?  Why weren’t the holders and/or owners of the notes punished?  After all, the servicers … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreclosure | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment