FIGHT BANKS, GO TO JAIL–OR BE KILLED?

upside down flag

So let’s see…Mary McCulley fights US Bank–wins $6 million–but goes to jail on dubious charges.  Other bank fighters are facing the same possible fate, as previously mentioned in a story from almost exactly 6 months ago:

“LOS ANGELES, Calif. – Jan. 13, 2014 – Is it just a coincidence Harvard University alumni Karen Rozier, and her unlicensed Cal-Poly Pomona degreed architect husband and Eagle Scout David Rozier, Sr., now find themselves wrongfully convicted of being ‘uneducated’ and ‘unqualified’ and facing jail—while fighting two of the biggest banks in the United States? Or do Bank of America and US Bank (U.S. Bankcorp, N.A.) have way too much influence to shut down wronged homeowners in this “Too big to fail” banking climate?”

But now they’re killing people who fight back–again, US Bank:

CENTRAL POINT — Two Jackson County deputies were serving an eviction order on an Ashland man Tuesday when he came out of his bedroom pointing a shotgun at them, and they shot and killed him, the sheriff said Wednesday.

Sheriff Mike Winters told reporters at a Wednesday news conference that both deputies fired a total of four times and 73-year-old Earl Carlson Harris was hit at least twice. He was pronounced dead on the scene.

……….

The Mail Tribune reported Harris had waged a lengthy foreclosure court battle and was ordered in May to be removed by sheriff’s deputies. He had posted his property with “No Trespassing” signs specifically warning police to keep out. Court documents showed Harris represented himself in a 2012 federal lawsuit challenging the eviction, arguing the judge was biased and the state had no jurisdiction.

The story also notes that the now-dead homeowner–Mr. Harris–flew an American flag upside down which the writer says was “apparently signaling anti-government views.”  In fact, an upside-down flag is a distress signal, when there is an extreme threat to life and property:

“§ 8(a)The flag should never be displayed with the union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property.”

So given the outcome of this situation, with the homeowner being shot at 4 times (hit twice) and being outnumbered (story indicates that “four SWAT team members were serving the eviction order, and a total of seven to 10 deputies were on scene”–so at least 11, possibly 14 police to the one homeowner) and facing superior firepower, his upside-down flag was entirely appropriate as he was in fact facing extreme danger to his life and his property.

Foreclose The Shit Meme

Well, that’s certainly one way to make sure you can take somebody’s house, right?  Just off them.  Just send a bunch of cops out to someone’s house, and you know, just fuckin’–take ’em out.  Light ’em up.  Worked in Fallujah!  No reason it won’t work in Oregon.  Or any other state.  Or any other house.  Like for instance–your state.  Your house.

Yep, they’ll just come right on in your house–your castle–come right into your bedroom (as this story says) and if you so much as point a gun at armed men who are trained to deal with such situations–they’ll just execute you.  It’s the American way!

Jesus Christ, what are we to do…the financial terrorism is becoming physical terrorism…

Rest in peace, Mr. Harris…rest in peace, right to life, liberty, and property (unless you’re a bank)…

 

 

About eggsistense

Writer, musician, cartoonist, human being
This entry was posted in Bank of America, Crap-italism, Debt Slavery, Everything Is Rigged, Feudalism, Foreclosure, Foreclosure fraud, Mary McCulley, Police State, US Bank and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to FIGHT BANKS, GO TO JAIL–OR BE KILLED?

  1. If any homeowner in Washington used this law we would be shot by a swat team immediately http://theolympiareport.com/washington-one-of-31-states-with-stand-your-ground-law/

  2. What a flippin joke! This law is road kill like the US Consitution is road kill in Washington State. The banks and the sheriffs are committing felonies with every eviction by fraud assignments on county records.
    Castle doctrine in Washington State

    We now seem to have a pretty solid castle doctrine in Washington State:

    RCW 9A.16.050
    Homicide — By other person — When justifiable.

    *** CHANGE IN 2011 *** (SEE 5045.SL) ***

    Homicide is also justifiable when committed either:

    (1) In the lawful defense of the slayer, or his or her husband, wife, parent, child, brother, or sister, or of any other person in his presence or company, when there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design on the part of the person slain to commit a felony or to do some great personal injury to the slayer or to any such person, and there is imminent danger of such design being accomplished; or

    (2) In the actual resistance of an attempt to commit a felony upon the slayer, in his presence, or upon or in a dwelling, or other place of abode, in which he is.
    RCW 9A.52.025
    Residential burglary.

    *** CHANGE IN 2011 *** (SEE 5891-S.SL) ***

    (1) A person is guilty of residential burglary if, with intent to commit a crime against a person or property therein, the person enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling other than a vehicle.

    (2) Residential burglary is a class B felony. In establishing sentencing guidelines and disposition standards, the sentencing guidelines commission and the juvenile disposition standards commission shall consider residential burglary as a more serious offense than second degree burglary.
    RCW 9A.52.040
    Inference of intent.

    In any prosecution for burglary, any person who enters or remains unlawfully in a building may be inferred to have acted with intent to commit a crime against a person or property therein, unless such entering or remaining shall be explained by evidence satisfactory to the trier of fact to have been made without such criminal intent.
    I haven’t taken the time to see what changed in 2011. Has this combination existed before?

    Reply With Quote .

  3. County recorders and the parties filing fraud documents appear to be “COMMITTING SECURITIES FRAUD”! If your loan is allegedly in a PSA trust and or never entered into the trust it was suppose to be posted in until after the trust was closed, all assignments after the trust closes are securities fraud.

    The mortgage assignments are VOID ab initio per the Section 29 of the Securities Exchange Act. This also means that the assignment was not “recordable” under state and federal law. In fact, the County Recorder appears to be violating Securities Law by recording an assignment to a securitized trust, after it’s Closing Date.

    REGULATION OF THE USE OF MANIPULATIVE AND DECEPTIVE DEVICES

    SEC. 10. It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange—
    (b) To use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security registered on a national securities exchange or any security not so registered, or any securities-based swap agreement, any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection
    of investors.
    I believe most all homeowners are Glaski cases that qualifyall the post dated assignments in county records to be securities fraud and a felony However that is my unprofessional opinion.
    When this happenes , the mortgage assignments are VOID ab initio per the Section 29 of the Securities Exchange Act. This also means that the assignment was not “recordable” under state and federal law. In fact, the County Recorder is violating Securities Law by recording an assignment to a securitized trust, after it’s Closing Date.

  4. It appears we are under Marshal Law, not Castle law or Constitutional law.

  5. nootkabear says:

    The Bank With The Most Homes in the End Wins!!! They don’t give a rat’s ass about you!

  6. Karen R. says:

    Thanks for including our story in this article. I recently discovered that the “Los Angeles City Investigator” (out of Lakewood) works for Kamala Harris. I have been quite outspoken against Ms.Harris from the very beginning, even acusing her of sleeping her way to that position. As a qualified, educated Black woman, I don’t like Black women who slut their way into power and then who pretend as though they have earned it. Ms. Harris wants to teach me a lesson using the courtroom. I would hate to teach the state of California a lesson using what Carnegie Mellon and the Navy taught me, which is how to destroy.

    I pray the peaceful citizens turn the state around, but if not, I am now willing to work with the not-so-peaceful citizenry. Thanks to the City of Lakewood Clerk Denise Hayward, I no longer feel compelled to minimize loss of life.

    We are at war. Govern yourself accordingly. [We have been flying our flag upside down since December 13, 2013. We expect resistance. I encourage anyone facing eviction — we are not — to booby trap your home if you are prepared to die. Make no mistake, you will be killed. If you are intent on making a last stand. make it count. If you are going to take one, take one for the team.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s